Of course, as the criteria of perfect competition, these criteria are forging a democratic ideal controller (in Kant’s sense), they refer to any real democracy. This means that nobody can be accused of intentions or preferences. Democracy is based on her public space and thus the strict separation of private and public. Absorbs the power of civil society, man is reduced to the citizen. Totalitarianism, as shown by Hannah Arendt and Claude Lefort means the sinking of the private into the public: any, y is the most intimate, must be in the public square. Here the difference between totalitarianism and democracy is meaningless. – In the system: within the public space must be fluid exchanges between members of the polity – From below: people should find expression in their relay political claim. – From the top: the information must come down the political elites The democratic public space must be a triple space open: The public debate should be fluid, without distortion. Intermediate bodies (unions, associations, intellectual elites, corporations) need to express themselves through media uncensored. Otherwise, elective termination of the contract is called a coup, that a takeover illegitimate.Ĭommunication can not be reduced to a vertical policies / citizens. Zero position can not be acquired for life, or even extended without the consent of citizens. If this is not the case, the political system is so aristocratic. Politics must be open, all political positions available. Thus, the electorate still has the choice. Of course, there have majorities to govern, but also opposition parties. Members have organized themselves into political parties, regulating the life of power or elections. The model of the ecclesia faded to give way to representative government. Since the extension of the states has forced citizens to adopt interim, representatives (representative democracy). the text of Hegel’s “beautiful Greek freedom”). Originally, the first direct democracies are limited because: the body politic is composed of the privileged few who have the time required to conduct their own political destiny (cf. This separation sometimes exists in reality, but it must be constitutionally guaranteed, that exist in a state of law. Otherwise, the concentration of power, means absolutism. Is the notion of power-cons is essential. – In democracy, the powers (executive, legislative and judicial) must be balanced not only separate but (Montesquieu). I confine myself in the ticket to address the political definition of democracy and devote a more detailed note on the philosophies of democracy. The recent Indian election, issue of 700 million voters, raises the question of the nature, the essence of political regimes from which the theoretical and factual plan a political regime can be called “democratic”? What is the fundamental difference between political regimes?Ī political regime (as defined by the political science) is judged in terms of 5 criteria. What is democracy? A Political definition
0 kommentar(er)
